In Praise Of The DODO

Bootleg albums, obscure public domain releases and forgotten films unearthed by specialist labels – not all illicit film and music releases should be condemned as ‘piracy’.

I’ve long thought that there are distinct differences between bootleg movies, pirate discs, unconvincing claims of public domain status and other forms of unlicensed and legally questionable physical releases, though all naturally have blurred lines separating them and often come from the same sources. So on the occasions that you have to lump them all in together, I’ve taken to calling these releases DODOs – Discs of Dubious Origin. And at the risk of outraging official distributors, I’m going to make an argument in favour of them. Well, most of them.

First off, let’s write off the most openly illegal and opportunist discs, the pirate editions of mainstream movies. These are increasingly the most unlikely to appear on physical media these days, though you’d be surprised at how many still appear on market stalls and in countries with rather more lax copyright enforcement. These are – probably -going to be the discs produced and sold by criminal organisations rather than movie fans, though even with these I have doubts about the frankly hysterical claims that have long been made by the authorities – the oft-stated suggestion that pirate discs somehow finance drug cartels and people traffickers (those activities apparently being so low-profit that they can only be sustained by the sale of dodgy copies of the new Mission Impossible film) without any evidence being provided beyond ‘well, of course they are’. I have no time for these releases. Beyond taking a stance against the growing corporate control that giant conglomerates hold over the entertainment industry while still wanting to see the latest blockbuster release without adding to their obscene profits – which I guess is a legitimate reason of sorts – or wanting to see the uncut version of a film that has been cut or otherwise edited in your territory, then there is little justification for pirating new releases… and certainly not onto physical media. So let’s leave that aside for now and move on.

The type of discs that I’m talking about are a mixed bag of unofficial releases that, far from biting into the profits of distributors and producers, simply fill a gap in the market. This gap can be anything from a film being unavailable due to some rights snarl-up through distributor disinterest due to a perceived lack of commercial viability to simply making available that which has been deleted. This last point is perhaps more controversial than the others. Specialist distributors these days increasingly release films in limited editions, and this is usually a calculated guess at just how many copies they are likely to sell to both their regular buyers and people who just want that film. It does sometimes mean that a movie becomes unavailable while there are still people who want to buy it. Add to this the issue of rights expiring and companies going bust, and you can see why there might be an audience for facsimile Blu-ray or DVD editions of those releases. I actually picked up a couple recently – I won’t say where, obviously – and have to admit that it was a somewhat accidental event. OK, I had my suspicions. The discs were suspiciously cheap and in resealable wrappers rather than shrinkwrap. But these were titles that are now unavailable in legitimate versions anymore unless you want to pay exorbitant eBay reseller prices. The original releases are long since deleted and the films have not been available for several years, so it’s hard to see who exactly will be suffering from the sale of these bootleg editions apart from those aforementioned eBay resellers – and frankly, fuck those opportunists.

Films that have not had a release at all seem to be even fairer game for the DODO. Film fairs in the UK were, for years, awash with DVD bootlegs of films that were otherwise unavailable – sometimes due to censorship reasons, sometimes because they simply hadn’t been released on disc (and often, for the two reasons combined). The packaging effort on these discs varied – the most ambitious not only had newly designed covers but printed labels as well and came with additional extras – everything from trailers to documentaries that were equally unlikely to see legit release. You would always be taking a chance on these discs – the unpredictability of the DVD-R in the early 2000s meant that it might not play on your particular player and even the slightest scuff might render a disc useless. The films themselves were usually lifted from VHS and so not exactly the best quality. But long before the boutique distributor was a thing, this was the only way to obtain rare and obscure titles – and certainly, the only way to buy classic adult movies back when the owners of labels like Vinegar Syndrome were still at school.

No matter how hard you might try, it is difficult to make a case that this was hurting anyone financially. No one was buying these releases instead of a legit release – the moment any of these films became legitimately available, the collectors would obviously dump their VHS dupe in favour of the remastered edition with copious extras. Of course they would. All these discs did was fill a gap for the insatiable collector.

It’s similar to the fatuous arguments made against music bootlegs. Let’s be blunt – no one in the 1970s/1980s was buying a Led Zeppelin live bootleg LP for £20+ instead of The Song Remains the Same for a quarter of the price. Music bootlegs fed the collector mentality, the person who could never have enough. Those buyers had already exhausted every legitimate album and single by their favourite bands, often in multiple versions; bootleg albums just filled the demand for more. Beyond that, they had cultural importance – these releases often became the only record of an era, documenting classic shows or even entire tours that would have otherwise gone unrecorded, alongside the demos and alternate cuts that would later become the staple of the collector’s edition box set. Bootlegs showed that there was this insatiable market with money to burn long before the corporate record labels realised it and began issuing every recording that they could find (some sourced, of course, from those same bootleg albums previously dismissed as inferior and worthless).

There are other variants of the DODO – the curious interpretation of ‘public domain’ that allows US PD specialists to release 1970s European films that are definitely still copyrighted but have US prints that lack that copyright info and so are seen as PD; how many copies of Count Dracula and His Vampire Bride have been issued even though the blurry print in question is just a retitling of Hammer’s The Satanic Rites of Dracula? That copyright holders don’t take more action on this is fascinating, because they must know about it by now – but perhaps they are aware that these substandard editions don’t impact on the sales of the legit releases at all. In any case, public domain (which, yes, does not exist legally in the UK other than by default – if a US film is PD in America, who can a distributor buy the rights from?) has arguably saved a lot of old films from obscurity. The prints may be variable (though some are unexpectedly excellent) but who would be issuing a lot of those Bela Lugosi movies if they had to pay for the rights?

The PD argument was what legitimised a lot of the US VHS distributors that you would find advertising in magazines like Psychotronic back in the day. Something Weird made its reputation on legally dubious releases that were taken from Mike Vraney’s vast collection of 16mm and 35mm film prints – and that label saved more obscure movies than any legitimate film archive has (and made them much more available to the public). Yes, some of the prints were barely watchable on tape – but without his sterling efforts, these films would be lost forever. Other labels like Sinister Cinema did likewise, making rare, forgotten and ignored movies available to the public once more. What they did may have been, technically, piracy – but they arguably helped build the audience for the off-mainstream titles that now sustain the boutique labels of today.

Outside the very specialist collectors market – 1930s westerns for instance – it does feel as though the non-PD DODO has somewhat bitten the dust these days. Between the relative ease of downloading from sites like Cinemageddon, the vast amount of content on YouTube and the increasing demand for quality from the Blu-ray/UHD collector market, the dubious physical releases of titles that you just can’t get legally have become a thing of the past. This is a pity in many ways. There will always be those films that won’t (or can’t) be picked up for restoration and ‘ultimate edition’ release but which a handful of people would still love to own as something less transient than a download. We should never forget that today’s specialist labels and collector’s box sets would not exist if the grey market had not paved the way, sustaining interest in and availability of forgotten and ignored movies, allowing the fan press to see and write about these movies back when no one in the mainstream had even heard of Mario Bava, let alone Andy Milligan. If we leave aside straight-forward piracy, then bootlegging only ever builds an audience – it costs copyright holders nothing and at best, shows that there is a market for something that might have previously been considered unviable. We should all be in favour of that.


Like what we do? Support us and help us do more!



  1. Have to agree with every word you wrote. I’m frankly bewildered at the ability of so many labels to issue ‘radio show’ concerts on CD/vinyl with no kickback. Gawd help Bowie fans with the dross being shovelled out virtually every week now. There is also a very cynical re bootlegging of bootlegs of bands like the Cramps..generally with abysmal covers and pressings. (do anyof these ‘collectors’ even play the damn rekkid?) When these are on sale in even the few big high street shops that remain what’s up? Then there are the ’50 year’ ‘out of copyright’ comps where someone buys a box set from a label like Bear Family who has paid the artists and for remastering etc and cherry picks a CDs worth without having to pay anyone a penny. Is this right/fair? Finally gotta mention many of the supposedly legit re releases from 70s era punk bands without original band members being consulted/paid…to me that is much worse than bootlegging…turns out many of the much revered indie labels were even better at ripping off their artists than the majors..go figger!..

  2. One of the more recent DODO’s I acquired was Red Nights of the Gestapo, released on DVD via the Excalibur label. This odd release sports a BBFC 18 certificate… although, as far as I can tell, the BBFC have never certified this movie. It was (maybe still is) available at a number of legitimate outlets.

    1. Interesting. The only time I’m aware of the BBFC dealing with this film was on the original theatrical release, when it was heavily cut. I might seek this out. The world of ‘legitimate’ releases that sport BBFC certificates but have never actually been submitted is worth an article in itself (but we won’t snitch, so maybe not).

      1. CeX have it listed pre-owned for £12 (but it’s currently out of stock), and there are a few ebay sellers offering “new” copies for under a tenner.
        It’s a pretty bare-bones release; no extras that I remember, and non-anamorphic widescreen… but it is the fully uncut version – certainly not the version that was cut for an X rated theatrical release.

  3. Something Weird’s decision to stop shipping DVDs overseas is one of the great tragedies of modern times. Yes, you can opt for a download…but it’s just not the same.

  4. All those radio broadcast CDs are available because of a legal technicality that meant the performance was/is in the public domain. There was the incident of U2 printing and distributing inlay cards for a forthcoming radio-broadcasted concert, openly encouraging home taping – much to the annoyance of the BPI … The way I see it, a big bootleg discography is a status symbol for a band – an index of their popularity, hence Dave Grohl amongst others avidly collecting boots of Nirvana, for e.g. … The phenomenal number of Cramps or Stooges bootlegs (and quasi-bootlegs, with some band members being in on them) only served to further their underground credibility, and in the cases of Bomp and Fan Club labels, put some cash in the hand s of the artists who may ahve been shortchanged by the legit industry. Of course, the legit rights owners are legally entitled to the dough, but their insistence on hoovering up every iota of cash, every penny, when they are already rolling in it, wrankles. The bootleg sector, distinct as you say, from piracy, is a by-product of the industry, and for the most part (no halos, but this is the earthly realm after all) it is driven by genuine, irrational passion for the, yes, Ahrt-with-a-capital Fart of the matter.

    Something Weird and Sinister were more akin to humane organisations, taking in unloved waifs and neglected strays and feeding them up to health. And as for those Punk reissues and accusations of sharp practice, maybe there are no perfectly white hats, but equally, many bands reputations were ressurected and revivified by bootleggers. And not so long ago, it wasn’t so easy to track down the pseudonymous players listed on the back of a 45 of which maybe ten copies were in existence. They couldve made more money booting Springsteen concerts. Everybody seems to think they have an ordained right to be a megastar on the level of Robert Pollard now. You can actually live off weird music? The idea of a one-shot leap into obscurity is gone now, for better or worse. A different mentality prevails – but are we just the possessers of a new set of delusions?

    I pore over the Severin, Arrow etc catalogs as if they was skin mags, specally since they’ve switched to super HD formats that I don’t hav ethe right gizmos for. There was a cutoff that felt like HAL setting Dave adrift in space. There must be other losers in this tragic niche with me. I wonder aloud about licensing lower-quality DVD issues in limited numbers, packaged in homage to the Hollywood DVD label , think Absurd and Anthropophagous on a double sided disc, with magnificently cheap dayglo art. Kind of a legit boot – I’m really turned on by this kind of conceptual merchandising, who else isnt?

    Finally, a splendid site exists, I’ll mention the name since they openly advertise on insta (I’ll use the HALIBM cryptogram actually, just in case THE MAN is lurking hereabouts), IG3H, they have lots of neat stuff that majors and indies alike have no interest, inclination or ability to offer for sale at present. Anyone got Jigoku, 1979???

    Finally, I am the kind of berk who ends up with three copies or more of beloved films. I hang on to my Filmfair Deep End boot, even though I was first in line for the vastly superior Flipside edition. I still watch t sometimes too! It’s evocative of those dusty-kneed days.

    What is the deal with the BBFC on Isle Of Man and Channel Islands? If a vid company set up shop selling over the net, mail order, could they sell uncertificated stuff?

Comments are closed.